4.4 Article

Regulation of Tbx3 expression by anteroposterior signalling in vertebrate limb development

期刊

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 250, 期 2, 页码 251-262

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/dbio.2002.0762

关键词

limb development; Tbx3; Shh; Bmp; chick embryo; mouse embryo; talpid(3)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tbx3, a T-box gene family member related to the Drosophila gene optomotor blind (omb) and encoding a transcription factor, is expressed in anterior and posterior stripes in developing chick limb buds. Tbx3 haploinsufficiency has been linked with the human condition ulnar-mammary syndrome, in which predominantly posterior defects occur in the upper limb. Omb is expressed in Drosophila wing development in response to a signalling cascade involving Hedgehog and Dpp. Homologous vertebrate signals Sonic hedgehog (Shh) and bone morphogenetic protein 2 (Bmp2) are associated in chick limbs with signalling of the polarising region which controls anteroposterior pattern. Here we carried out tissue transplantations, grafted beads soaked in Shh, Bmps, and Noggin in chick limb buds, and analysed Tbx3 expression. We also investigated Tbx3 expression in limb buds of chicken and mouse mutants and retinoid-deficient quail in which anteroposterior patterning is abnormal. We show that Tbx3 expression in anterior and posterior stripes is regulated differently. Posterior Tbx3 expression is stable and depends on the signalling cascade centred on the polarising region involving Shh and Bmps, while anterior Tbx3 expression is labile and depends on the balance between positive Bmp signals, produced anteriorly, and negative Shh signals, produced posteriorly. Our results are consistent with the idea that posterior Tbx3 expression is involved in specifying digit pattern and thus provides an explanation for the posterior defects in human patients. Anterior Tbx3 expression appears to be related to the width of limb bud, which determines digit number. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据