4.7 Article

The optical spectra of 24 μm galaxies in the cosmos field.: I.: Spitzer MIPS bright sources in the zCOSMOS-bright 10k catalog

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 680, 期 2, 页码 939-961

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/588038

关键词

galaxies : abundances; galaxies : active; galaxies : evolution; infrared : galaxies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study zCOSMOS-bright optical spectra for 609 Spitzer MIPS 24 mu m-selected galaxies with S-24 (mu m) > 0: 30 mJy and I < 22.5 (AB mag) over 1.5 deg(2) of the COSMOS field. From emission-line diagnostics we find the following: (1) SFRs derived from the observed H alpha lambda 6563 and H beta lambda 4861 lines underestimate, on average, the total SFR by factors of similar to 5 and 10, respectively. (2) Both the Calzetti et al. and the Milky Way reddening laws are suitable to describe the extinction observed in IR sources in most cases. (3) Some IR galaxies at z < 0: 3 have low abundances, but many others with similar IR luminosities and redshifts are chemically enriched. (4) The average [ O III] lambda 5007/H beta lambda 4861 ratios of nu L-nu(24) (mu m) > 10(11) L-circle dot galaxies at 0.6 < z < 0.7 are similar to 0.6 dex higher than the average ratio of all zCOSMOS galaxies at similar redshifts. Massive star formation and AGNs could simultaneously be present in those galaxies with the highest ionizing fluxes. (5) Roughly 1/3 of the galaxies with metallicity measurements at 0.5 < z < 0.7 lie below the general mass-metallicity relation at the corresponding redshifts. The strengths of the 4000 angstrom break and the H delta EW of our galaxies show that secondary bursts of star formation are needed to explain the spectral properties of most IR sources. The LIRG and ULIRG phases occur, on average, between 10(7) and 10(8) yr after the onset of a starburst on top of underlying older stellar populations. These results are valid for galaxies of different IR luminosities at 0.6 < z < 1.0 and seem independent of the mechanisms triggering star formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据