4.6 Article

Direct dynamics Simulations of collision- and surface-induced dissociation of N-protonated glycine. Shattering fragmentation

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 106, 期 42, 页码 9983-9992

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp020664q

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct dynamics classical trajectory simulations are used to study energy transfer and unimolecular dissociation in collisions of N-protonated glycine, (gly-H)(+), with an argon atom and a hydrogenated diamond {111} surface. The (gly-H)(+) potential is represented by the AM1 semiempirical electronic structure theory and analytic potentials developed previously are used for the diamond surface and the (gly-H)(+)/Ar and (gly-H)(+)/diamond intermolecular potentials. The AM1 potential for (gly-H)(+) gives the same collisional energy transfer distributions as does the AMBER empirical force field. For (gly-H)(+) + diamond {111} at a collision energy and angle of 70 eV and 45degrees; the average percent energy transfer to (gly-H)(+) vibration/rotation, to the surface, and to final ion translation are 12, 38, and 50, respectively. A distribution of (gly-H)(+) dissociation products are observed in these collisions, with similar to55% of the dissociations occurring while (gly-H)(+) co(l)lides with the surface, i.e., shattering fragmentation. Shattering is initiated when the orientation of (gly-H)(+) and the hardness of the collision drives a H-atom from CH2 to the carbonyl carbon or a H-atom from NH3 to the carbonyl oxygen or ejects a H-2 molecule from NH3. Shattering is not important in (gly-H)(+) collisions with Ar at 13 eV and an impact parameter of zero, but as found for the surface collisions, the Ar collision may force H-atom transfer. The simulations suggest that nonstatistical fragmentation dynamics may be important in the collisional dissociation of protonated amino acids and peptides. The collision may directly drive the ion to a fragmentation transition state structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据