4.5 Article

Targeted inactivation of the neurotensin type 1 receptor reveals its role in body temperature control and feeding behavior but not in analgesia

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 953, 期 1-2, 页码 63-72

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)03271-7

关键词

neurotensin receptor; knockout mouse; feeding; weight control; hypothermia; analgesia; hypolocomotion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three subtypes of neurotensin receptor have been described, two members of the heptahelical transmembrame domain G protein-coupled receptor superfamily NT-1R and NT-2R, and NT-3R unrelated to this family. We have generated NT-1R deficient (NT-1R(-/-)) mice. NT-1R(-/-) mice were born at the expected Mendelian frequency without obvious abnormalities and they were fertile. The NT-induced analgesia on the writhing induced by phenyl-p-benzoquinone administration remained at wild-type levels in the NT-1R(-/-) mice demonstrating that the NT-1R is not implicated in the analgesic effect of NT in this test. The NT-1R(-./-) mice were hyperthermic; their body temperature was not affected by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of NT, contrasting with the hypothermia induced in NT-1R(+/+) mice. NT-1R(-/-) mice showed a small significant increase in body weight compared to the NT-1R(+/+) congeners as early as 10 weeks after birth, correlated with a higher food intake. NT-1R(-/-) mice showed similar spontaneous locomotion to the control littermates, but did not respond to i.c.v. NT-induced hypolocomotion. I.c.v. injection of NT inhibited feeding in fasted wild-type mice, but had no effect on feeding of the NT-1R(-/-) mice. I.c.v. administration of the orexigenic neuropeptide Y (NPY) stimulated feeding to the same extent in both wild-type and NT-1R(-/-) mice. This analysis of NT-1R-deficient mice shows that the NT-1R does not play a role in NT-induced analgesia, but that it is clearly implicated in thermal and feeding regulation, weight control, and NT-induced hypolocomotion. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据