4.6 Article

Risk factors for lymphoproliferative disorders after liver transplantation in adults:: An analysis of 480 patients

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 74, 期 8, 页码 1103-1109

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200210270-00008

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a well-known complication of organ transplantation that leads to death in more than 50% of cases. The aim of this work was to identify specific risk factors for lymphoproliferative disorders after liver transplantation in adults. Methods. A total of 480 consecutive patients who underwent transplantation between 1986 and 1997 were studied (323 men, 157 women; mean age: 49.8 +/- 10.4 years). Demographics, the indication for transplantation, the immunosuppressive regimens, the incidence of rejection episodes, and Epstein-Barr virus infection were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to identify factors predictive of PTLD. Results. Sixteen cases of PTLD (3.3%) occurred at a median of 5.5 (range, 1-39) months after liver transplantation. All 16 cases occurred in patients with evidence of exposure to Epstein-Barr virus before transplantation. In multivariate analysis, the use of antilymphocyte antibodies (P=0.007, relative risk [RR] = 4.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5-11.7), age older than 50 years (P=0.037, RR=3.5, 95% CI=0.95-13.0), liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus cirrhosis (P=0.015, RR=8.7, 95% CI=1-78.3), and liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis (P=0.015, RR=9.6, 95% CI=1.2-77.2) were independently associated with the onset of PTLD. Conclusion. Liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus-related and alcoholic cirrhosis and age older than 50 years are three additional risk factors for lymphoproliferative disorder independent of the use of antilymphocyte antibodies. The use of antilymphocyte antibodies after liver transplantation should be avoided in these categories of patients, especially those older than 50 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据