4.5 Article

Immune correlate study on human Schistosoma japonicum in a well-defined population in Leyte, Philippines:: II.: Cellular immune responses to S-japonicum recombinant and native antigens

期刊

ACTA TROPICA
卷 84, 期 2, 页码 137-149

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-706X(02)00177-8

关键词

Schistosoma japonicum; Schistosomiasis; 'resistant' and 'susceptible' individuals; cellular immune responses; peripheral blood mononuclear cell; cell proliferation; cytokines; IFN-gamma; IL-10; IL-5

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellular immune responses to specific Schistosoma japonicum recombinant and native antigens were investigated in a defined study population of 155 individuals in the Philippines, where data collected from a 3-year observation of exposure, infection and reinfection pattern were used to categorically classify putative 'resistant' and 'susceptible' individuals. Using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of individuals enrolled in the study, in vitro lymphocyte proliferation and cytokine (IFN-gamma, IL-5 and IL-10) production in response to defined recombinant antigens (97 kDa paramyosin, 22 kDa tegumental antigen, 37 kDa glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, 14 kDa fatty acid binding protein and 28 kDa gluthathione-S-tranferase) and native antigen soluble worm antigen preparation (SWAP) were measured. Cellular responses to the recombinant and SWAP antigens suggest that Th1 type of response appear to be important in predicting resistance in this population. Of the five recombinant antigens tested, rPMY induced significant levels of IFN-gamma. The production of IL-10, a Th2-type cytokine was strongly implicated in immune regulation. Of importance was the evidence found for SWAP and rPMY induced IFN-gamma responses in predicting 'resistance'. It was noted that these associations were significant even after the effect of age and sex were accounted for in a multivariate analysis. Crown Copyright (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据