4.5 Article

Spectrum and expression analysis of KRIT1 mutations in 121 consecutive and unrelated patients with Cerebral Cavernous Malformations

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 733-740

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200870

关键词

Cerebral Cavernous Malformations; Krit1; haploinsufficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cerebral Cavernous Malformations (CCM/MIM 604214) are vascular malformations characterised by abnormally enlarged capillary cavities without intervening brain parenchyma. Clinical manifestations include seizures, cerebral haemorrhages and focal neurological deficits. They occur as a sporadic or autosomal dominant condition. Most often, sporadic cases have only one lesion and familial cases are characterised by a high frequency of multiple lesions. Three CCM loci were previously mapped on 7q (CCM1), 7p (CCM2) and 3q (CCM3) and CCM1 gene was identified as coding Krit1, a protein of unknown function, which was shown initially to interact in yeast two hybrid assays with Rap1A, a small ras GTPase and more recently to Icap1alpha, a modulator of beta1 integrin signal transduction. Herein, we screened KRIT1 gene in 121 unrelated, consecutively recruited, CCM probands having at least one affected relative and/ or showing multiple lesions on cerebral MRI. Fifty-two of these probands (43%) were shown to carry a KRIT1 mutation. Forty-two distinct mutations were identified including six recurrent ones. Three-quarters of these mutations were located in the C-terminal half of the gene, mostly within exons 13, 15 and 17. All of them are predicted to lead to a premature stop codon. No missense mutation was identified. The only two nucleotide substitutions predicted to be missense mutations led in fact to an abnormal splicing and a premature stop codon. Altogether these data suggest that KRIT1 mRNA decay due to the presence of premature stop codons and Krit1 haploinsufficiency may be the underlying mechanism of CCM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据