3.8 Article

Caffeine is ergogenic after supplementation of oral creatine monohydrate

期刊

MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
卷 34, 期 11, 页码 1785-1792

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200211000-00015

关键词

anaerobic capacity; ergogenic aids; perceptual response; fatigue

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to assess the acute effects of caffeine ingestion on short-term, high-intensity exercise (ST) after a period of oral creatine supplementation and caffeine abstinence. Methods: Fourteen trained male subjects performed treadmill running to volitional exhaustion (T-lim) at an exercise intensity equivalent to 125% VO2max. Three trials were performed, one before 6 d of creatine loading (0.3 g(.)kg(-1.)d(-1); baseline), and two further trials after the loading period. One hour before the postloading trials, caffeine (5 mg(.)kg(-1)) or placebo was orally ingested in a cross-over, double-blind fashion. Four measurements of rating of perceived exertion were taken, one every 30 s, during the first 120 s of the exercise. Blood samples were assayed for lactate, glucose, potassium, and catecholamines, immediately before and after exercise. Results: Body mass increased (P < 0.05) over the creatine supplementation period, and this increase was maintained for both caffeine and placebo trials. There was no increase in the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit between trials; however, total VO2 was significantly increased in the caffeine trial in comparison with the placebo trial (13.35 +/- 3.89 L vs 11.67 +/- 3.61 L). In addition, caffeine T-lim (222.1 +/- 48.9 s) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than both baseline (200.8 +/- 33.4 s) and placebo (198.3 +/- 45.4 s) T-lim. RPE was also lower at 90 s in the caffeine treatment (13.8 +/- 1.8 RPE points) in comparison with baseline (14.6 +/- 1.9 RPE points). Conclusion: As indicated by a greater T-lim, acute caffeine ingestion was found to be ergogenic after 6-d of creatine supplementation and caffeine abstinence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据