4.7 Article

Machining with tool-chip contact on the tool secondary rake face - Part I: a new ship-line model

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES
卷 44, 期 11, 页码 2337-2354

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7403(02)00185-6

关键词

machining; slip-line; tool secondary rake face; tool-chip contact length

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given the growing number of applications of groove-type chip breaker tools in modern machining, it is becoming; increasingly important to study the tool-chip. contact on the tool secondary rake face. This type of tool-chip contact significantly changes not only the state of stresses in the plastic deformation region, but also changes the distribution of forces and temperatures over the tool rake face. A new slip-line model accounting. for the tool-chip contact on the tool secondary rake face is proposed in this paper. The model also takes into account chip curl and incorporates seven slip-line models developed for machining during the last six decades as special cases. Dewhurst and Collins's matrix technique for numerically solving slip-line problems and Powell's algorithm of nonlinear optimization are employed in the mathematical formulation of the model. The inputs of the model include (a) the tool primary rake angle gamma(1), (b) the tool secondary rake angle gamma(2), (c) the tool land length h, (d) the undeformed chip thickness t(1), (e) the ratio of hydrostatic pressure P-A to the material shear flow stress k, (f) the ratio of frictional shear stress tau(1) on the tool primary rake face to the material shear flow stress k, and (g) the ratio of frictional shear stress tau(2) on the tool secondary rake face to the material shear flow stress k. The outputs of the model include (a) the, cutting force F-c/kt(1)w and the thrust force F-t/kt(1)w; (b), the, chip up-curl radius R-u, (c) the chip thickness t(2), and (d) the natural tool-chip contact length l(n). (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据