4.7 Article

One-step SFE-plus-C18 selective extraction of low-polarity compounds, with lipid removal, from smoked fish and bovine milk

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 374, 期 5, 页码 923-931

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-002-1552-z

关键词

SFE lipid removal; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; GC--MS; smoked fish; bovine milk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Co-extraction of lipid materials is the major source of interference in determinations of low-polarity compounds in many biological matrixes. SFE-plus-C-18. a recently developed supercritical fluid extraction method employing C-18 adsorbent in the extraction chamber, can enable selective extraction of low-polarity compounds in lipid-rich biological matrixes without a cleanup step, This study reports the application of the SFE-plus-C-18 method to the quantification of: 1. polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in commercially purchased smoked fish; and 2. anti-cancer agents cyclophosphamide (CP) and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) spiked into homogenized whole bovine milk. Over the course of SFE-plus-C-18 extraction, indigenous lipids are preferentially retained on the C-18 adsorbent. Compared with the conventional method, only 8-15% of the lipids in the smoked fish sample, and only 6-18% of the lipids in the milk sample, were co-extracted by SFE-plus-C-18. This reduction in the quantity of background lipids significantly improved chromatographic separations, retarded deterioration of the column, and dramatically improved the ability to quantify PAH present at trace levels in smoked fish by GC-MS. Using the SFE-plus-C-18 method, ten targeted PAH were detected in the range 9.5-13.5 ng g(-1) in the smoked fish sample. Compared with these levels, PAH extractions by use of conventional SFE gave values that were lower by 38-86%. Recoveries of CP and SAHA spiked into milk were close to 100% in both SFE-plus-C-18 and conventional SFE, where the lipid background during the chromatographic elution of CP and SAHA was not so severe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据