4.2 Article

Life-cycle associations involving pairs of holococcolithophorid species: intraspecific variation or cryptic speciation?

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 531-550

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1017/S0967026202003852

关键词

coccolithophorids; cryptic speciation; haptophytes; holococcolith-heterococcolith combinations; intraspecific variation; life-cycles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New holococcolith-heterococcolith life-cycle associations are documented based on observations of combination coccospheres, Daktylethra pirus is shown to be a life-cycle phase of Syracosphaera pulchra and Syracolithus quadriperforatus a life-cycle phase of Calcidiscus lcptoporus. In addition. new observations from cultures confirm the life-cycle associations of Crystallolithus bracirudii with Coccolithus pelagicus and of Zygosphaera hellenica with Coronosphaera mediterranea. In all four cases previous work has shown that the heterococcolithophorid species is associated with another holococcolithophorid. Two other examples of a heterococcolithophorid being associated with two holococcolithophorids have previously been identified, so this seems to be a common phenomenon. The six examples are reviewed to determine whether a single underlying mechanism is likely to be responsible for all cases. It is concluded that there is no single mechanism but rather that the six examples fall into three categories: (a) in two cases the holococcolith types are probably simply ecophenotypic morphotypes: (b) in two other cases the holococcolith types are discrete and are paralleled by morphometric differences in the heterococcolith types: (c) in the final two cases the holococcolith types are discrete but are not paralleled by any obvious morphological variation in the heterococcolith morphology. We infer that cryptic speciation may be widespread in heterococcolithophorid phases and that study of holococcolithophorid phases can provide key data to elucidate this phenomenon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据