4.8 Article

Prognostic significance of calcium-binding protein S100A4 in colorectal cancer

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 123, 期 5, 页码 1478-1484

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.36606

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Prognostication in colon cancer almost exclusively still rests on the tumor stage. Furthermore, tumor-derived markers to improve discrimination of low- and high-risk subtypes generally are not in use. S100A4 has been reported to be associated with invasion and metastasis; however, no data are available on its prognostic value in colorectal carcinoma. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic significance of immunohistochemical S100A4 expression in colorectal carcinoma compared with clinicopathologic parameters and expression of cell-cycle markers p16, p21, p27, p53, Ki-67, and RB. Methods: Archival tissue from 709 patients with colorectal cancer were retrieved, applied in tissue array technology, and investigated immunohistochemically. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were carried out on all investigated parameters. Results: Sixteen percent of cases showed high; 31%, low; and 53%, no S100A4 expression. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, S100A4 positively stained cases showed a significantly decreased survival time compared with negatively stained cases (P < 0.0001). In multivariate regression analysis, S100A4 expression emerged as a highly significant independent parameter (P < 0.001) with the highest relative-risk factor among other covariates. Nodal status (pN) lost its prognostic value if S100A4 was added to the model. High S100A4 expression was associated with tumor stage pT3/4, secondary metastasis, women, p16, and RB expression. Conclusions: S100A4 expression represents a highly significant prognostic marker in colorectal carcinoma, which is able to identify a subset of patients at high risk. In this respect, it is superior to established prognostic markers such as nodal status, pT stage, and p53 expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据