4.5 Article

Intense episodic predation by shorebirds may influence life history strategy of an intertidal amphipod

期刊

OIKOS
卷 99, 期 2, 页码 368-376

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.990219.x

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Life history theory suggests that selective predation on older or larger individuals in prey populations or a disturbance such as intense and episodic predation should lead to smaller size at maturity, and a tendency toward semelparity. Many populations of the intertidal amphipod, Corophium volutator, in the western Atlantic are subjected to an intense period of size-selective predation for about one month in summer, during the southward migration of shorebirds. We compared size at maturity and fecundity of populations of C. volutator from mudflats that are intensively used by shorebirds with populations that are visited by very few birds. We found that mature females were of similar size in May, but those from bird mudflats produced more offspring during the first reproductive episode. In July, females of the summer generation began to reproduce at a smaller size on bird mudflats, and as a consequence, produced fewer offspring that grew more slowly. The results of this correlative study suggest that shorebird predation has shaped C. volutator life history in two ways. First, females on bird mudflats concentrate their reproductive effort into a larger early brood, probably because later broods would come to maturity during the period of intense predation. Second, in summer, amphipods begin to reproduce at a smaller size so as to produce a brood before the arrival of the birds in mid-July. Predators are not present at the time that these responses occur, and thus they are probably not a plastic response to perceived predation risk. Thus the patterns we observed agree with the predictions of recent theories: individuals faced with a predictable disturbance alter their life cycles so as to minimize the effect of that disturbance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据