3.8 Article

Thermostability of manganese- and iron-superoxide dismutases from Escherichia coli is determined by the characteristic position of a glutamine residue

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 269, 期 21, 页码 5137-5148

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03200.x

关键词

superoxide dismutase; site-directed mutagenesis; metal specificity; thermostability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structurally homologous mononuclear iron and manganese superoxide dismutases (FeSOD and MnSOD, respectively) contain a highly conserved glutamine residue in the active site which projects toward the active-site metal centre and participates in an extensive hydrogen bonding network. The position of this residue is different for each SOD isoenzyme (Q69 in FeSOD and Q146 in MnSOD of Escherichia coli). Although site-directed mutant enzymes lacking this glutamine residue ( FeSOD [Q69G] and MnSOD [ Q146A]) demonstrated a higher degree of selectivity for their respective metal, they showed little or no activity compared with wild types. FeSOD double mutants ( FeSOD [ Q69G/A141Q]), which mimic the glutamine position in MnSOD, elicited 25% the activity of wild-type FeSOD while the activity of the corresponding MnSOD double mutant ( MnSOD [ G77Q/Q146A]) increased to 150% (relative to wild-type MnSOD). Both double mutants showed reduced selectivity toward their metal. Differences exhibited in the thermostability of SOD activity was most obvious in the mutants that contained two glutamine residues (FeSOD [A141Q] and MnSOD [G77Q]), where the MnSOD mutant was thermostable and the FeSOD mutant was thermolabile. Significantly, the MnSOD double mutant exhibited a thermal-inactivation pro le similar to that of wild-type FeSOD while that of the FeSOD double mutant was similar to wild-type MnSOD. We conclude therefore that the position of this glutamine residue contributes to metal selectivity and is responsible for some of the different physicochemical properties of these SODs, and in particular their characteristic thermostability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据