4.5 Review

The expansion field:: the value of H0

期刊

ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS REVIEW
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 289-331

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00159-008-0012-y

关键词

stars : population II; Cepheids; supernovae : general; distance scale; cosmological parameters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Any calibration of the present value of the Hubble constant (H-0) requires recession velocities and distances of galaxies. While the conversion of observed velocities into true recession velocities has only a small effect on the result, the derivation of unbiased distances which rest on a solid zero point and cover a useful range of about 4-30 Mpc is crucial. A list of 279 such galaxy distances within v < 2,000 km s(-1) is given which are derived from the tip of the red-giant branch (TRGB), from Cepheids, and/or from supernovae of type Ia (SNe Ia). Their random errors are not more than 0.15 mag as shown by intercomparison. They trace a linear expansion field within narrow margins, supported also by external evidence, from v = 250 to at least 2,000 km s(-1). Additional 62 distant SNe Ia confirm the linearity to at least 20,000 km s(-1). The dispersion about the Hubble line is dominated by random peculiar velocities, amounting locally to < 100 km s(-1) but increasing outwards. Due to the linearity of the expansion field the Hubble constant H (0) can be found at any distance > 4.5 Mpc. RR Lyr star-calibrated TRGB distances of 78 galaxies above this limit give H (0) = 63.0 +/- 1.6 at an effective distance of 6 Mpc. They compensate the effect of peculiar motions by their large number. Support for this result comes from 28 independently calibrated Cepheids that give H-0 = 63.4 +/- 1.7 at 15 Mpc. This agrees also with the large-scale value of H-0 = 61.2 +/- 0.5 from the distant, Cepheid-calibrated SNe Ia. A mean value of H-0 = 62.3 +/- 1.3 is adopted. Because the value depends on two independent zero points of the distance scale its systematic error is estimated to be 6%. Other determinations of H-0 are discussed. They either conform with the quoted value (e.g. line width data of spirals or the D-n-sigma method of E galaxies) or are judged to be inconclusive. Typical errors of H-0 come from the use of a universal, yet unjustified P-L relation of Cepheids, the neglect of selection bias in magnitude-limited samples, or they are inherent to the adopted models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据