4.8 Article

High prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in patients with Crohn's disease

期刊

GUT
卷 51, 期 5, 页码 654-658

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gut.51.5.654

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims: Osteopenia and osteoporosis are frequent in Crohn's disease. However, there are few data on related vertebral fractures. Therefore, we evaluated prospectively the prevalence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in these patients. Methods: A total of 293 patients were screened with dual energy x ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) and proximal right femur. In 156 patients with lumbar osteopenia or osteoporosis (T score <--1), x ray examinations of the thoracic and lumbar spine were performed. Assessment of fractures included visual reading of x rays and quantitative morphometry of the vertebral bodies (T4-L4), analogous to the criteria of the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. Results: In 34 (21.8%; 18 female) of 156 Crohn's disease patients with reduced bone mineral density, 63 osteoporotic vertebral fractures (50 fx. (osteoporotic fracture with visible fracture line running into the vertebral body and/or change of outer shape) and 13 fxd. (osteoporotic fracture with change of outer shape but without visible fracture line)) were found, 50 fx. in 25 (16%, 15 female) patients and 13 fxd. in nine (5.8%, three female) patients. In four patients the fractures were clinically evident and 30 years. Lumbar bone mineral density was significantly reduced in patients with fractures compared with those without (T score -2.50 (0.88) v -2.07 (0.66); p<0.025) but not at the hip (-2.0 (1.1) v -1.81 (0,87); p=0.38). In subgroups analyses, no significant differences were observed. Conclusions: In patients with Crohn's disease and reduced bone mineral density, the prevalence of vertebral fractures-that is manifest osteoporosis-was strikingly high at 22%, even in those aged less than 30 years, a problem deserving further clinical attention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据