4.5 Article

Cyclooxygenase inhibitors block cell growth, increase ceramide and inhibit cell cycle

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
卷 76, 期 1, 页码 57-64

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020224503335

关键词

breast cancer; cell cycle; ceramide; cyclooxygenase

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA82888] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have shown previously in a model of metastatic breast cancer that murine mammary tumor cells express both cyclooxygenase-1 (Cox-1) and Cox-2 isoforms. Growth and metastasis of these tumors in syngeneic hosts are inhibited by either selective Cox-1 (SC560) or selective Cox-2 (celecoxib) inhibitors. To gain insight into the relevant mechanisms involved in the therapeutic response, we determined the effect of Cox inhibitors on tumor cell behavior in vitro. We now report that either selective Cox-1 or Cox-2 drugs inhibited cell replication, but only at concentrations that are no longer selective for either isoform. Growth delay by either nonselective or selective inhibitors was associated with changes in cell morphology including cell rounding; these changes were reversed upon removal of drug. Unlike many other cell types examined, treatment of these mammary tumor cells with Cox inhibitors was not associated with detectable apoptosis. Growth inhibition, induced by either selective or nonselective Cox inhibitors, was accompanied by increased intracellular levels of the sphingolipid ceramide by 1.7-2.6-fold in comparison to vehicle-treated cells. Ceramide changes are associated with cell cycle arrest and we observed that all the Cox inhibitors examined increased significantly the number of cells in G(0)/G(1) and reduced the S phase fraction. Likewise, addition of a cell-permeable form of ceramide (C6-ceramide) could mimic the effect of Cox inhibitors on both cell cycle and cell growth inhibition. Thus, mammary tumor cells are growth restricted by Cox inhibitors. These effects are associated with changes in ceramide levels and a block in cell cycle progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据