4.8 Article

Large-scale gene expression analysis of osteoblasts cultured on three different Ti-6Al-4V surface treatments

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 23, 期 21, 页码 4193-4202

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00161-8

关键词

osteoblast; implant; surface treatment; gene expression; apoptosis; cDNA microarray

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI36214] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To improve implant biocompatibility, we developed a simple cost-effective thermal surface treatment allowing an increase in the oxide layer thickness of a titanium (Ti) alloy used in orthopaedic implants. The goal of this study was to test in vitro the reaction of osteoblasts to the developed surface treatment and to compare it to the osteoblast reaction to two other surface treatments currently used in the practice of implant surgery. Quantification of osteoblast gene expression oil a large scale was used in this study. The kinetics of gene expression over 120 h was followed for 58 genes to quantify the effect of the developed surface treatment. Twenty eight genes were further selected to compare the effects of surface treatments on osteoblasts. Based on the genes studied, we could propose a general pathway for the cell reaction according to the surface treatments used: (1) metal ion release changes the time Course of gene expression in the FAK pathway; (2) once the accumulation of metal ions released from the Ti surface exceeds a threshold value, cell growth is diminished and apoptosis may be activated; (3) PTK up-regulation is also induced by metal ion release; (4) the expression of Bcl-2 family and Bax may suggest that metal ions induce apoptosis. The developed treatment seems to increase the Ti-6Al-4V biocompatibility as highlighted by the lower impact of this treatment by the different pathways studied, on the lower inflammatory reaction that could be induced, as well as by the lower induced osteoblast apoptosis compared to the two other surface treatments. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据