4.6 Article

The LSGGQ motif in each nucleotide-binding domain of human P-glycoprotein is adjacent to the opposing Walker A sequence

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 277, 期 44, 页码 41303-41306

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.C200484200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA80900] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein (P-gp, ABCB1), a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) family of transport proteins, actively transports many cytotoxic compounds out of the cell. ABC transporters have two nucleotide-binding domains (NBD) and two transmembrane domains. The presence of the conserved signature sequence (LSGGQ) in each NBD is a unique feature in these transporters. The function of the signature sequences is unknown. In this study, we tested whether the signature sequences ((531)LSGGQ(535) in NBD1; (1176)LSGGQ(1180) in NBD2) in P-gp are in close proximity to the opposing Walker A consensus nucleotide-binding sequences ((1070)GSSGCGKS(1077) in NBD2; (427)GNS- GCGKS(434) in NBD1). Pairs of cysteines were introduced into a Cys-less P-gp at the signature and Walker A sites and the mutant P-gps were subjected to oxidative cross-linking. At 4 degreesC, when thermal motion is low, P-gp mutants (L531C(Signature)/C1074(Walker A) and C431(Walker A)/L1176C (Signature) were cross-linked. Cross-linking inhibited the drug-stimulated ATPase activities of these two mutants. Their activities were restored, however, after addition of the reducing agent, dithiothreitol. Vanadate trapping of nucleotide at the ATP-binding sites prevented cross-linking of the mutants. These results indicate that the signature sequences are adjacent to the opposing Walker A site. They likely participate in forming the ATP-binding sites and are displaced upon ATP hydrolysis. The resulting conformational change may be the signal responsible for coupling ATP hydrolysis to drug transport by inducing conformational changes in the transmembrane segments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据