4.4 Article

Private dental coverage - Who has it and how does it influence dental visits and expenditures?

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
卷 133, 期 11, 页码 1551-1559

出版社

AMER DENTAL ASSN
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0087

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Dental insurance has had a significant impact on dentistry and dental care use. Dental insurance coverage may influence people's decisions to use dental care. During 1996, 42.9 percent of all dental expenditures were paid by private dental insurance. Methods: The focus of this analysis is on private dental coverage, use and expenditures for the U.S. civilian community-based population during 1996. The authors provide national estimates for the population with a dental visit, mean number of dental visits per year mean total expenditures for several socioeconomic and demographic categories during 1996, using Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, or MEPS, data. Results: Poor and low-income people were less likely to have private dental coverage than were people with higher incomes. People without higher incomes. People without coverage at all income levels were less likely to report a dental visit than education at any income level did not appear to affect the likelihood of people's having multiple visits or higher expenditures. Conclusions: People with private coverage are more likely to visit a dentist, have a greater number of visits and have higher expenditures than are those without coverage. Private dental insurance coverage, however, is not the only determinant of dental care use. MEPS data also show that other factors play key roles. Comprehensive strategies designed to improve dental care use should keep each of those determinants in mind. Practice Implications: While dentists may have a limited ability to influence people to seek care initially, they may be in a better position to influence the amount of care patients obtain, thereby helping make sure that patients receive the care that they need and want.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据