4.6 Article

Peculiarity of hexamethylenetetratellurafulvalene (HMTTeF) charge transfer complexes of donor-acceptor (D-A) type

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
卷 168, 期 2, 页码 486-496

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/jssc.2002.9733

关键词

tellurium; HMTTeF; charge transfer complex; conductivity; IR spectrum; UV-Vis-Nir spectrum; donor; acceptor; F(4)TCNQ

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The complex formation of hexamethylenetetratellurafulvalene (HMTTeF) with 28 kinds of organic electron acceptors yielded 31 charge transfer (CT) complexes. The infrared and ultraviolet-visible-near-infrared spectra of the complexes were examined to study the ionicity of their ground states in solid. A plot of CT transition energies and the difference of redox potentials; DeltaE(DA) of donor (D) and acceptor (A) molecules indicated that four complexes have a neutral ground state. Four other complexes exhibit characteristic features of a fully ionic ground state based on the vibrational spectra. Notably, the HCBD, F(4)TCNQ and DDQ complexes indicate both a relatively low first CT band and high conductivity in a solid in spite of the fully ionic character being very plausible. Twenty-three complexes having a partially ionic ground state have a CT band below 4 x 10 cm(-1) and are highly conductive. The preparation of good single crystals of the HMTTeF complexes for structural analysis was only successful with Et(2)TCNQ and BTDA-TCNQ, which have the structure of DA alternately stacking. These two complexes indicate high conductivities in spite of their disadvantageous packing manner. The intermolecular interactions are found to be strongly enhanced by both the bulky molecular orbital of HMTTeF and the decreased on-site Coulomb repulsion in the HMTTeF complexes. These two factors in particular seem to prevent both the fully ionic and the DA alternating HMTTeF complexes from becoming insulators, even though the redox parameters and the crystal structures predict them to be insulating. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据