4.5 Article

Risk of resistant infections with Enterobacteriaceae in hospitalized neonates

期刊

PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 11, 页码 1029-1033

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00006454-200211000-00010

关键词

antimicrobial resistance; nosocomial infections; neonates; critical care; infection control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To determine the risk factors associated with progression from colonization to infection with health care-associated antimicrobial-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae (ANE) in critically ill neonates. Study design. During a 3-year period (1998 to 2000), surveillance rectal cultures were performed on neonates admitted to our Level Ill neonatal intensive care unit after a cluster of four cases of ANE infection were identified in 1998. ANE were defined as members of the Enterobacteriaceae family that exhibited nonsusceptibility to ceftazidime or laboratory evidence of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production. Results. A total of 1710 patients were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit during the study period. Of the 1710 patients 300 (18%) were excluded from the risk factor analysis. Of the 1410 remaining neonates the incidence of health care-associated ANE colonization was 17% (240 of 1410 patients), and 14% of the colonized patients (34 of 240 patients) developed ANE infections. Of the 206 ANE-colonized patients who did not develop disease, 60 (29%) harbored ESBL-producing isolates. Of the 34 ANE-infected patients, 14 (41%) yielded growth of ESBL-producing isolates. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that colonized neonates with very low birth weights (<1000 g) and those who had received prolonged exposures to antimicrobial agents were at increased risk of ANE infections. Conclusions. Colonization with ANE places hospitalized neonates at risk for development of systemic infections. Very low birth weight (<1000 g) and prolonged exposure to antimicrobial agents were the only two independent risk factors associated with ANE infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据