4.6 Article

Standing sausage waves in photospheric magnetic waveguides

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 563, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220542

关键词

Sun: atmosphere; Sun: oscillations; sunspots; Sun: photosphere

资金

  1. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC).
  2. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research NWO
  3. Netherlands Graduate School for Astronomy NOVA
  4. SOZOU
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/J001430/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. STFC [ST/J001430/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. By focussing on the oscillations of the cross-sectional area and the total intensity of magnetic waveguides located in the lower solar atmosphere, we aim to detect and identify magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) sausage waves. Methods. Capturing several high-resolution time series of magnetic waveguides and employing a wavelet analysis, in conjunction with empirical mode decomposition (EMD), makes the MHD wave analysis possible. For this paper, two sunspots and one pore (with a light bridge) were chosen as examples of MHD waveguides in the lower solar atmosphere. Results. The waveguides display a range of periods from 4 to 65 min. These structures display in-phase behaviour between the area and intensity, presenting mounting evidence for sausage modes within these waveguides. The detected periods point towards standing oscillations. Conclusions. The presence of fast and slow MHD sausage waves has been detected in three different magnetic waveguides in the solar photosphere. Furthermore, these oscillations are potentially standing harmonics supported in the waveguides that are sandwiched vertically between the temperature minimum in the lower solar atmosphere and the transition region. The relevance of standing harmonic oscillations is that their exploitation by means of solar magneto-seismology may allow insight into the sub-pixel resolution structure of photospheric MHD waveguides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据