4.6 Article

The elemental composition of the Sun III. The heavy elements Cu to Th

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 573, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424111

关键词

Sun: abundances; Sun: photosphere; Sun: granulation; line: formation; line: profiles; convection

资金

  1. Max Planck Institut fur Astrophysik, Garching
  2. Centre Spatial de Liege
  3. Department of Astrophysics, Geophysics and Oceanography, University of Liege
  4. Mount Stromlo Observatory
  5. Royal Belgian Observatory
  6. IAU Commission 46
  7. Lorne Trottier Chair in Astrophysics
  8. (Canadian) Institute for Particle Physics
  9. Banting Fellowship
  10. UK Science & Technology Facilities Council
  11. Australian Research Council
  12. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K00414X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. STFC [ST/K00414X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We re-evaluate the abundances of the elements in the Sun from copper (Z = 29) to thorium (Z = 90). Our results are mostly based on neutral and singly-ionised lines in the solar spectrum. We use the latest 3D hydrodynamic solar model atmosphere, and in a few cases also correct for departures from local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) using non-LTE (NLTE) calculations performed in 1D. In order to minimise statistical and systematic uncertainties, we make stringent line selections, employ the highest-quality observational data and carefully assess oscillator strengths, hyperfine constants and isotopic separations available in the literature, for every line included in our analysis. Our results are typically in good agreement with the abundances in the most pristine meteorites, but there are some interesting exceptions. This analysis constitutes both a full exposition and a slight update of the relevant parts of the preliminary results we presented in Asplund et al. (2009, ARA&A, 47, 481), including full line lists and details of all input data that we have employed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据