4.8 Article

Earlier hepatic vein transit-time measured by contrast ultrasonography reflects intrahepatic hemodynamic changes accompanying cirrhosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 578-583

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8278(02)00264-7

关键词

ultrasonography; cirrhosis; hepatic vein transit-time; pulse-inversion imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Non-invasive diagnosis of cirrhosis by transit-time analysis of an ultrasound contrast agent has been reported, even though the mechanism by which contrast arrives to the hepatic vein earlier in cirrhosis than in normal controls is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess whether the earlier appearance of contrast in the hepatic vein depends on intrahepatic or extrahepatic causes. Methods: There were 15 participants: six volunteers, three patients with hepatitis, and six with cirrhosis. The contrast agent was given intravenously, and transit-time analysis of the hepatic artery, portal vein and hepatic vein was performed. The time-acoustic intensity curves in the three vessels were analyzed by an image and cineloop display and quantification software package. Results: The hepatic artery and portal vein arrival times were not significantly different among the three groups. On the other hand, hepatic vein arrival times were significantly earlier in cirrhosis (median 18 seconds) compared with arrival times in hepatitis patients (median 30 seconds, P < 0.001) and in healthy volunters (median 31 seconds, P < 0.001). These results give support to a previous pilot study and indicate that most of the time delay in hepatic vein arrival time between cirrhosis and the other groups originated from intrahepatic circulation abnormalities. Conclusions: This study confirms that the earlier appearance of contrast in the hepatic vein observed in cirrhosis is due to intrahepatic, and not extrahepatic, hemodynamic changes. (C) 2002 European Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据