4.6 Article

Serotonin 5-HT3 receptors in rat CA1 hippocampal interneurons:: functional and molecular characterization

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 544, 期 3, 页码 715-726

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.029736

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular makeup of the serotonin 5-HT3 receptor (5-HT3R) channel was investigated in rat hippocampal CA1 interneurons in slices using single-cell RT-PCR and patch-clamp recording techniques. We tested for the expression of the 5-HT3A (both short and long splice variants) and 5-HT3B subunits, as well as the expression of the alpha4 subunit of the neuronal nicotinic ACh receptors (nAChRs), the latter of which has been shown to co-assemble with the 5-HT3A subunit in heterologous expression systems. Both the 5-HT3A-short and alpha4-nAChR subunits were expressed in these interneurons, but we could not detect any expression of either the 5-HT3B or the 5-HT3A-long subunits. Furthermore, there was a strong tendency for the 5-HT3A-short and a4-nAChR subunits to be co-expressed in individual interneurons. To assess whether there was any functional evidence for co-assembly between the 5-HT3A-short and alpha4-nAChR subunits, we used the sulphydryl agent 2-aminoethyl methanethiosulphonate (MTSEA), which has previously been shown to modulate expressed 5-HT(3)Rs that contain the alpha4-nAChR subunit. In half of the interneurons examined, MTSEA significantly enhanced the amplitude of the 5-HT3R-mediated responses, which is consistent with the notion that the alpha4-nAChR subunit co-assembles with the 5-HT3A Subunit to form a native heteromeric 5-HT3R channel in rat CA1 hippocampal interneurons in vivo. In addition, the single-channel properties of the 5-HT3R were investigated in outside-out patches. No resolvable single-channel currents were observed. Using non-stationary fluctuation analysis, we obtained an estimate of the single-channel conductance of 4 pS, which is well below that expected for channels containing both the 5-HT3A and 5-HT3B subunits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据