4.7 Article

Urate produced during hypoxia protects heart proteins from peroxynitrite-mediated protein nitration

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 33, 期 9, 页码 1243-1249

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0891-5849(02)01020-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [AA/DK11589] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tyrosine nitration is a common modification to proteins in vivo, but the reactive nitrogen species responsible for nitration are often studied in vitro using just the. amino acid tyrosine in simple phosphate solutions. To investigate which reactive nitrogen species could nitrate proteins in a complex biological system, we exposed rat heart and brain homogenates to peroxynitrite, nitric oxide under aerobic conditions, and other putative nitrating agents. Peroxynitrite was by far the most efficient nitrating agent when alternative targets were available to compete with tyrosine. Curiously, proteins in heart homogenates were substantially more resistant to nitration than brain homogenates. Ultrafiltration to remove low molecular weight compounds made the heart proteins equally susceptible as the brain proteins to nitration. Endogenous ascorbate and free thiols had little effect on nitration by peroxynitrite in either heart or brain. However, accumulation of urate formed by the oxidation of hypoxanthine by xanthine dehydrogenase and oxidase in heart appeared to be the major inhibitor of nitration. Heart homogenates treated with uricase, which converts urate to allantoin, showed equivalent nitration as in brain homogenates. Urate, as assayed by HPLC, was 58 +/- 8 muM in heart but only 4 +/- 2 muM in brain homogenates. Although xanthine dehydrogenase conversion to a free radical-producing oxidase can serve as an important source of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide during ischemia/reperfusion, our results suggest that urate formation by xanthine dehydrogenase may provide a significant antioxidant defense against peroxynitrite and related nitric oxide-derived oxidants. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据