4.6 Article

Heating efficiency in hydrogen-dominated upper atmospheres

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 571, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423573

关键词

planets and satellites: atmospheres; ultraviolet: planetary systems; planets and satellites: physical evolution

资金

  1. FWF NFN [S116 607-N16]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [14-12-01048]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [14-12-01048] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. The heating efficiency eta(h nu) is defined as the ratio of the net local gas-heating rate to the rate of stellar radiative energy absorption. It plays an important role in thermal-escape processes from the upper atmospheres of planets that are exposed to stellar soft X-rays and extreme ultraviolet radiation (XUV). Aims. We model the thermal-escape-related heating efficiency eta(h nu) of the stellar XUV radiation in the hydrogen-dominated upper atmosphere of the extrasolar gas giant HD 209458b. The model result is then compared with previous thermal-hydrogen-escape studies, which assumed eta(h nu) values between 10-100%. Methods. The photolytic and electron impact processes in the thermosphere were studied by solving the kinetic Boltzmann equation and applying a Direct Simulation Monte Carlo model. We calculated the energy deposition rates of the stellar XUV flux and that of the accompanying primary photoelectrons that are caused by electron impact processes in the H-2 -> H transition region in the upper atmosphere. Results. The heating by XUV radiation of hydrogen-dominated upper atmospheres does not reach higher values than 20% above the main thermosphere altitude, if the participation of photoelectron impact processes is included. Conclusions. Hydrogen-escape studies from exoplanets that assume eta(h nu) values that are >= 20% probably overestimate the thermal escape or mass-loss rates, while those who assumed values that are <20% produce more realistic atmospheric-escape rates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据