4.6 Article

SDSS superclusters: morphology and galaxy content

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 562, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323111

关键词

large-scale structure of Universe; galaxies: general; galaxies: clusters: general

资金

  1. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. US Department of Energy
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  5. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  6. Max Planck Society
  7. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  8. American Museum of Natural History
  9. Astrophysical Institute Potsdam
  10. University of Basel
  11. University of Cambridge
  12. Case Western Reserve University
  13. University of Chicago
  14. Drexel University
  15. Fermilab
  16. Institute for Advanced Study
  17. Japan Participation Group
  18. Johns Hopkins University
  19. Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics
  20. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology
  21. Korean Scientist Group
  22. Chinese Academy of Sciences (LAMOST)
  23. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  24. Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA)
  25. Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA)
  26. New Mexico State University
  27. Ohio State University
  28. University of Pittsburgh
  29. University of Portsmouth
  30. Princeton University
  31. United States Naval Observatory
  32. University of Washington
  33. Estonian Science Foundation [8005, 9428, MJD272, PUT246]
  34. Estonian Ministry for Education and Science [SF0060067s08]
  35. European Structural Funds grant for the Centre of Excellence Dark Matter in (Astro)particle Physics and Cosmology [TK120]
  36. ICRAnet
  37. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [SEV-2011-0187]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. Understanding the formation, evolution and present-day properties of the cosmic web and objects forming it is an important task in cosmology. Aims. We compare the galaxy populations in superclusters of different morphology in the nearby Universe (180 h(-1) Mpc <= d <= 270 h(-1) Mpc) to see whether the inner structure and overall morphology of superclusters are important in shaping galaxy properties in superclusters. Methods. We find supercluster morphology with Minkowski functionals and analyse the probability density distributions of colours, morphological types, stellar masses, star formation rate (SFR) of galaxies, and the peculiar velocities of the main galaxies in groups in superclusters of filament and spider types, and in the field. We test the statistical significance of the results with the KS test. Results. The fraction of red, early-type, low SFR galaxies in filament-type superclusters is higher than in spider-type superclusters; in low-density global environments their fraction is lower than in superclusters. In all environments the fraction of red, high stellar mass, and low SFR galaxies in rich groups is higher than in poor groups. In superclusters of spider morphology red, high SFR galaxies have higher stellar masses than in filament-type superclusters. Groups of equal richness host galaxies with larger stellar masses, a larger fraction of early-type and red galaxies, and a higher fraction of low SFR galaxies, if they are located in superclusters of filament morphology. The peculiar velocities of the main galaxies in groups from superclusters of filament morphology are higher than in those of spider morphology. Groups with higher peculiar velocities of their main galaxies in filament-type superclusters are located in higher density environment than those with low peculiar velocities. There are significant differences between galaxy populations of the individual richest superclusters. Conclusions. Both local (group) and global (supercluster) environments and even supercluster morphology play an important role in the formation and evolution of galaxies. Differences in the inner structure of superclusters of filament and spider morphology and the dynamical state of galaxy groups in them may lead to the differences found in our study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据