4.6 Article

Planck 2013 results. II. Low Frequency Instrument data processing

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 571, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321550

关键词

cosmic background radiation; methods: data analysis; cosmology: observations; surveys

资金

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I002006/1, ST/K002821/1, ST/K000985/1, ST/L000393/1, ST/K002805/1, ST/K001051/1, ST/K002899/1, ST/K004131/1, ST/L000768/1, ST/F010885/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. UK Space Agency [ST/H001212/1, ST/M007685/1, ST/K003674/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. STFC [ST/K002805/1, ST/K002899/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe the data processing pipeline of the Planck Low Frequency Instrument (LFI) data processing centre (DPC) to create and characterize full-sky maps based on the first 15.5 months of operations at 30, 44, and 70 GHz. In particular, we discuss the various steps involved in reducing the data, from telemetry packets through to the production of cleaned, calibrated timelines and calibrated frequency maps. Data are continuously calibrated using the modulation induced on the mean temperature of the cosmic microwave background radiation by the proper motion of the spacecraft. Sky signals other than the dipole are removed by an iterative procedure based on simultaneous fitting of calibration parameters and sky maps. Noise properties are estimated from time-ordered data after the sky signal has been removed, using a generalized least squares map-making algorithm. A destriping code (Madam) is employed to combine radiometric data and pointing information into sky maps, minimizing the variance of correlated noise. Noise covariance matrices, required to compute statistical uncertainties on LFI and Planck products, are also produced. Main beams are estimated down to the approximate to-20 dB level using Jupiter transits, which are also used for the geometrical calibration of the focal plane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据