4.7 Article

Use of mandelic acid condensation polymer (SAMMA), a new antimicrobial contraceptive agent, for vaginal prophylaxis

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 78, 期 5, 页码 1107-1115

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04210-3

关键词

contraception; spermatozoa; sexually transmitted infection; HIV; toxicology; microbicide

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [P01 HD41763] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [P01 A137940] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess the contraceptive properties, antimicrobial activity, and safety of mandelic acid condensation polymer (SAMMA). Design: Experimental study of SAMMA's in vitro and in vivo properties. Setting: Academic research laboratories. Patient(s): Healthy volunteers for semen donation in an academic research environment. Intervention(s): Inhibition of sperm function indicators, conception, sexually transmitted infection-causing pathogens (including HIV), and lactobacilli was evaluated. Safety indicators were studied. Main Outcome Measure(s): Quantitation of SAMMA's effect on microbial infectivity or multiplication and on sperm function in vitro; evaluation of contraceptive efficacy in vivo; assessment of safety in vitro and in vivo. Result(s): Mandelic acid condensation polymer is not cytotoxic toward lactobacilli, microbial host cells, and spermatozoa. The compound inhibits hyaluronidase and acrosin, induces sperm acrosomal loss, and is contraceptive in the rabbit model. Mandelic acid condensation polymer prevents infectivity of HIV and herpesviruses 1 and 2 and, to a lesser extent, of Chlamydia trachomatis. It inhibits the multiplication of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Mandelic acid condensation polymer is not mutagenic, has low acute oral toxicity, and is safe in the rabbit vaginal irritation assay. Conclusion(s): Mandelic acid condensation polymer inhibits sperm function, is contraceptive, has broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, and is highly safe. Further development as a microbicide is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据