4.6 Article

Far-infrared-detected Lyman-break galaxies at z ∼ 3 Dust attenuation and dust correction factors at high redshift

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 554, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321478

关键词

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: high-redshift; infrared: galaxies

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) [AYA2011-29517-C03-01]
  2. NASA [NAS5-26555]
  3. NASA Office of Space Science [NNX09AF08G]
  4. Very Large Telescope at the ESO Paranal Observatory [LP175.A-0839]
  5. ESO Telescopes at the La Silla or Paranal Observatories [171.A-3045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lyman-break galaxies (LBGs) represent one of the kinds of star-forming galaxies that are found in the high-redshift universe. The detection of LBGs in the far-infrared (FIR) domain can provide very important clues on their dust attenuation and total star-formation rate (SFR), allowing a more detailed study than has been performed so far. In this work we explore the FIR emission of a sample of 16 LBGs at z similar to 3 in the GOODS-North and GOODS-South fields that are individually detected in PACS-100 mu m or PACS-160 mu m. These detections demonstrate the possibility of measuring the dust emission of LBGs at high redshift. We find that PACS-detected LBGs at z similar to 3 are highly obscured galaxies which belong to the ultra-luminous or hyper-luminous IR galaxy class. Their total SFR cannot be recovered with the dust attenuation factors obtained from their UV continuum slope or their SED-derived dust attenuation employing Bruzual & Charlot (2003) templates. Both methods underestimate the results for most of the galaxies. Comparing with a sample of PACS-detected LBGs at z similar to 1, we find evidence that the FIR emission of LBGs might have changed with redshift, in the sense that the dustiest LBGs found at z similar to 3 have more prominent FIR emission, are dustier for a given UV slope, and have higher SFR for a given stellar mass than the dustiest LBGs found at z similar to 1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据