4.7 Article

Regulation of a rat VL30 element in human breast cancer cells in hypoxia and anoxia: role of HIF-1

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 87, 期 10, 页码 1173-1181

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600576

关键词

anoxia; hypoxia; VL30; retrotransposon; HRE; gene therapy

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel approaches to cancer gene therapy currently exploit tumour hypoxia to achieve transcriptional targeting using oxygen-regulated enhancer elements called hypoxia response elements. The activity of such elements in hypoxic cells is directly dependent on upregulation of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1 However tumours also contain areas of anoxia, which may be considered a more tumour-selective transcriptional stimulus than hypoxia for targeting gene therapy to tumours. Another element, from the rat virus-like retrotransposon, VL30 (termed the 'secondary anoxia response element') has been reported to be more highly inducible in rat fibroblasts under anoxia than hypoxia. To investigate anoxia as a potential transcriptional target in human tumours, we have examined secondary anoxia response element inducibility in two human breast cancer cell lines, MCF-7 and T47D, under anoxia, hypoxia and normoxia. In both cell types, the trimerised secondary anoxia response element showed greater inducibility in anoxia than hypoxia (1% and 0.5% O-2). The anoxic response of the secondary anoxia response element was shown to be dependent on hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1 and the presence of a hypoxia-inclucible transcription binding site consensus (5'-ACGTG-3'). Mutational analysis demonstrated that the base immediately 5' to this modulates the anoxic/hypoxic induction of the secondary anoxia response element, such that TACGTG > GACGTG > > CACGTG. A similar correlation was found for erythropoietin, phosphoglycerate kinase 1, and aldolase hypoxia response elements, which contain these respective 5' flanking bases. (C) 2002 Cancer Research UK.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据