4.3 Article

Massless higher spins and holography

期刊

NUCLEAR PHYSICS B
卷 644, 期 1-2, 页码 303-370

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00739-3

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We treat free large N superconformal field theories as holographic duals of higher spin (HS) gauge theories expanded around AdS spacetime with radius R. The HS gauge theories contain massless and light massive AdS fields. The HS current correlators are written in a crossing symmetric form including only exchange of other HS currents. This and other arguments point to the existence of a consistent truncation to massless HS fields. A survey of massless HS theories with 32 supersymmetries in D = 4, 5, 7 (where the 7D results are new) is given and the corresponding composite operators are discussed. In the case of AdS(4), the cubic couplings of a minimal bosonic massless HS gauge theory are described. We examine high energy/small tension limits giving rise to massless HS fields in the type IIB string on AdS(5) X S-5 and M-theory on AdS(4/7) X S-7/4. We discuss breaking of HS symmetries to the symmetries of ordinary supergravity, and a particularly natural Higgs mechanism in AdS(5) X S-5 and AdS(4) X S-7 where the HS symmetry is broken by finite gym. In AdS(5) X S-5 it is shown that the supermultiplets of the leading Regge trajectory cross g(YM)(2) = 0 corresponds to a critical string over into the massless HS spectrum. We propose that tension of order 1/R-2 and a finite string coupling of order 1/N. In AdS(7) X S-4 we give a rotating membrane solution coupling to the massless HS currents, and describe these as limits of Wilson surfaces in the A(N-1) (2, 0) SCFT, expandable in terms of operators with anomalous dimensions that are asymptotically small for large spin. The minimal energy configurations have semi-classical energy E = s for all s and the geometry of infinitely stretched strings with energy and spin density concentrated at the endpoints. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据