4.6 Article

ALMA detection of the rotating molecular disk wind from the young star HD 163296

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 555, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321129

关键词

stars: pre-main sequence; ISM: jets and outflows; ISM: kinematics and dynamics; stars: individual: HD 163296

资金

  1. Spanish MICINN [AYA2011-30228-C03]
  2. FEDER
  3. Millennium Science Initiative, Chilean Ministry of Economy: Nucleus [P10-022-F]
  4. NOVA
  5. KNAW
  6. EU A-ERC [291141]
  7. NWO Physical Sciences (The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), Physical Sciences)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Disk winds have been postulated as a mechanism for angular momentum release in protostellar systems for decades. HD 163296 is a Herbig Ae star surrounded by a disk and has been shown to host a series of HH knots (HH 409) with bow shocks associated with the farthest knots. Here we present ALMA science verification data of CO J = 2-1 and J = 3-2 emission, which are spatially coincident with the blue shifted jet of HH knots, and offset from the disk by -18.6 km s(-1). The emission has a double corkscrew morphology and extends more than 10 '' from the disk with embedded emission clumps coincident with jet knots. We interpret this double corkscrew as emission from material in a molecular disk wind, and that the compact emission near the jet knots is being heated by the jet that is moving at much higher velocities. We show that the J = 3-2 emission is likely heavily filtered by the interferometer, but the J = 2-1 emission suffers less due to the larger beam and sensitivity to larger scale structures. Excitation analysis suggests temperatures exceeding 900 K in these compact features, with the wind mass, momentum and energy being of order 10(-5) M-circle dot, 10(-4) M-circle dot km s(-1) and 10(40) erg, respectively. The high mass loss rate suggests that this star is dispersing the disk faster than it is funneling mass onto the star.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据