4.6 Article

Smooth-muscle progenitor cells of bone marrow origin contribute to the development of neointimal thickenings in rat aortic allografts and injured rat carotid arteries

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 74, 期 9, 页码 1310-1315

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200211150-00019

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study indicates that circulating progenitors of bone marrow origin give rise to cells with smooth muscle-like properties during formation of neointimal thickenings in the arterial wall after allotransplantation and after balloon injury. A segment of abdominal aorta was transplanted from female F344 to male LEW rats, and the grafts were analyzed for male cells by using the SRY gene as a marker. Immunostaining demonstrated that CD45-positive leukocytes made up 35-45% of the neointimal cells during the 8-week period examined. Concurrently, up to 70% of the neointimal cells were of host origin, as shown by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the SRY gene (Y chromosome). This suggests that the neointima contained host cells also of noninflammatory character. Accordingly, many cells positive for smooth-muscle a-actin were detected in this layer. To explore the possible bone marrow origin of allograft cells, female LEW rats were irradiated and substituted with bone marrow from male LEW rats. Subsequently, the animals received an aortic transplant from female F344 rats or were exposed to a balloon injury of the carotid artery. Immunostaining and real-time polymerase chain reaction confirmed the above findings, but the fractions of leukocytes and SRY-positive cells were lower in the carotids than in the allografts. Combined primed in situ labeling and immunostaining verified that not only inflammatory but also smooth muscle-like cells of male origin appeared in the vessel wall in both situations. These observations suggest that the smooth-muscle cells that participate in the development of neointimal lesions during vascular disease may, in part, originate from circulating progenitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据