4.6 Article

An intramolecular disulfide bridge as a catalytic switch for serotonin N-acetyltransferase

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 277, 期 46, 页码 44229-44235

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M203305200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Serotonin N-acetyltransferase (EC. 2.3.1.87) (AA-NAT) is a melatonin rhythm-generating enzyme in pineal glands. To establish a melatonin rhythm, AA-NAT activity is precisely regulated through several signaling pathways. Here we show novel regulation of AA-NAT activity, in which an intramolecular disulfide bond may function as a switch for the catalysis. Recombinant AANAT activity was irreversibly inhibited by N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) in an acetyl-CoA-protected manner. Oxidized glutathione or dissolved oxygen reversibly inhibited AA-NAT in an acetyl-CoA-protected manner. To identify the cysteine residues responsible for the inhibition, AA-NAT was first oxidized with dissolved oxygen, treated with NEM, reduced with dithiothreitol, and then labeled with [C-14]NEM. CyS61 and Cys(177) were specifically labeled in an acetyl-CoA-protected manner. The AA-NAT with the Cys(61) to Ala and Cys(177) to Ala double substitutions (C61A/C177A-AA-NAT) was fully active but did not exhibit sensitivity to either oxidation or NEM, whereas the AA-NATs with only the single substitutions retained about 40% of these sensitivities. An intramolecular disulfide bond between Cys(61) and Cys(177) formed upon oxidation and cleaved upon reduction was identified. Furthermore, Cl61A/C177A-AA-NAT expressed in COS7 cells wag relatively insensitive to H2O2-evoked oxidative stress, whereas wild-type AA-NAT was strongly inhibited under the same conditions. These results indicate that the formation and cleavage of the disulfide bond between Cys(61) and Cys(177) produce the active and inactive states of AA-NAT. It is possible that intracellular redox conditions regulate AA-NAT activity through switching via an intramolecular disulfide bridge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据