4.6 Article

Home cage activity and behavioral performance in inbred and hybrid mice

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 136, 期 2, 页码 555-569

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00228-0

关键词

inbred and hybrid mouse strains; spontaneous locomotor activity; open field; emergence; novel object; elevated zero maze

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH61716] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Locomotor activity is a key component in many behavioral tests, suggesting that genetic differences in activity levels may be a critical consideration when comparing mouse strains. In order to assess the relationship between activity and performance, we recorded home cage activity, and locomotion and defecation, a non-activity-linked behavior, in tests of anxiety in inbred (C57BL/6J (B6), n = 25; BALB/cJ (C), n = 24; DBA/2J (D2), n = 28) and hybrid (CB6FI/6J (CB6: B6 x Q n = 19) mice. Under our test conditions, the strains showed significant differences in home cage activity levels: C>B6>D2. The CB6 mice were similar to the B6 mice in horizontal activity and were intermediate between the parental strains in vertical movement. Based on measures of locomotion and defecation in the open field, emergence and novel object tests, and the elevated zero maze, the C mice appeared to be the most anxious and the B6 were the least anxious. The D2 mice were intermediate on some measures but more similar to B6 mice on others, making ranking them more difficult. In addition, the CB6 mice displayed characteristics of both parental strains. They had greater similarity to B6 mice in measures of horizontal movement in the home cage and locomotion in the open field and emergence tests, but exhibited defecation responses similar to those of C mice in the novel object test and elevated zero maze. The results suggest that strain differences in spontaneous locomotion should be considered when interpreting strain differences in behavioral tests, and that home cage activity may be a useful interpretive aid. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据