4.6 Article

SDSS DR7 superclusters The catalogues

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 539, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016288

关键词

large-scale structure of Universe; galaxies: clusters: general

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. US Department of Energy
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  4. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  5. Max Planck Society
  6. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  7. Estonian Science Foundation [8005, 7765, MJD272]
  8. Estonian Ministry for Education and Science [SF0060067s08]
  9. Center of Excellence of Dark Matter in (Astro)particle Physics and Cosmology [TK120]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have constructed a set of supercluster catalogues for the galaxies from the SDSS survey main and luminous red galaxy (LRG) flux-limited samples. To delineate superclusters, we calculated luminosity density fields using the B-3-spline kernel of the radius of 8 h(-1) Mpc for the main sample and 16 h(-1) Mpc for the LRG sample and define regions with densities over a selected threshold as superclusters, while utilising almost the whole volume of both samples. We created two types of catalogues, one with an adaptive local threshold and a set of catalogues with different global thresholds. We describe the supercluster catalogues and their general properties. Using smoothed bootstrap, we find uncertainty estimates for the density field and use these to attribute confidence levels to the catalogue objects. We have also created a test catalogue for the galaxies from the Millennium simulation to compare the simulated and observed superclusters and to clarify the methods we use. We find that the superclusters are well-defined systems, and the properties of the superclusters of the main and LRG samples are similar. We also show that with adaptive local thresholds we get a sample of superclusters, the properties of which do not depend on their distance from the observer. The Millennium galaxy catalogue superclusters are similar to those observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据