4.6 Article

Waiting time on dialysis as the strongest modifiable risk factor for renal transplant outcomes - A paired donor kidney analysis

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 74, 期 10, 页码 1377-1381

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200211270-00005

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Waiting time on dialysis has bee shown to be associated with worse outcomes after living and cadaveric transplantation. To validate an quantify end-stage renal disease (ESRD) time as independent risk factor for kidney transplantation we compared the outcome of paired donor kidney destined to patients who had ESRD more than 2 year compared to patients who had ESRD less than months. Methods. We analyzed data available from the U. Renal Data System database between 1988 and 1998 by Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models to quantify the effect of ESRD time on paired cadaveric kidneys and on all cadaveric kidneys con pared to living-donated kidneys. Results. Five- and 10-year unadjusted graft survival rates were significantly worse in paired kidney recipients who had undergone more than 24 months of dialysis (58% and 29%, respectively) compared to paired kidney recipients who had undergone less than months of dialysis (78% and 63%, respectively; P < 0.001 each). Ten-year overall adjusted graft survival for cadaveric transplants was 69% for preemptive trans plants versus 39% for transplants after 24 months on dialysis. For living transplants, 10-year overall ad adjusted graft survival was 75% for preemptive trans plants versus 49% for transplants after 24 month on dialysis. Conclusions. ESRD time is arguably the strongest independent modifiable risk factor for renal trans plant outcomes. Part of the advantage of living-donor versus cadaveric-donor transplantation may be ex plained by waiting time. This effect is dominant enough that a cadaveric renal transplant recipient with an ESRD time less than 6 months has the equivalent graft survival of living donor transplant recipients who wait on dialysis for more than 2 years.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据