4.5 Article

Cell type-selective expression of green fluorescent protein and the calcium indicating protein, yellow cameleon, in rat cortical primary cultures

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 956, 期 2, 页码 221-229

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)03518-7

关键词

cortical primary culture; green fluorescent protein; confocal microscope; calcium imaging; lipofection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A cell type-specific green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression system in rat cortical primary cultures has been developed for the fluorescence labeling of brain cells. Lipid-mediated transfection (lipofection) was employed, allowing the establishment of a convenient efficient system for the analysis of individual cells. To achieve cell type-specific labeling, GFP expression vectors containing the rat neuron-specific enolase (NSE) gene promoter, human glial fibril acidic protein (GFAP) gene promoter, human elongation factor (EF-1alpha) gene promoter, or human cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate early promoter were constructed, and their specificities examined. Vectors containing the CMV or GFAP promoter resulted primarily in GFP expression in astrocytes, while those containing the EF1-alpha or NSE promoter resulted primarily in GFP expression in neurons. This labeling system was applied to the morphological analysis of living neurons and to cell type-selective calcium imaging. Confocal microscopy revealed that individual GFP-expressing neurons had processes, which were longer than 500 mum and bore spine-like protrusions. A calcium-indicating GFP variant, yellow cameleon (YC2.1), was expressed in the same system, and cell type-selective calcium imaging performed. On pharmacological stimulation, YC2.1-expressing neurons responded to depolarizing stimuli, but not to the metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist, trans-(1S, 3R)-1-amino-1,3-cyclopentanedicarboxylic acid (tACPD), while astrocytes responded only to tACPD. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据