期刊
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 142, 期 6, 页码 691-700出版社
HELDREF PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1080/00224540209603929
关键词
gender; judgment of handwriting; stereotypes
In 2 experiments, participants judged 2 samples of adult handwriting for gender of writer; their accuracy was significantly better than chance and improved with practice. In a 3rd experiment, participants who were not cued for gender of writer judged coded male and female scripts to be significantly different with respect to features such as carefulness, neatness, regularity, and apparent speed of execution. The participants cued for gender of writer, on the basis of their judgments on stylistic features such as slope and roundness, which appeared to be subsumed within the higher order dimensions of carefulness versus confidence. The results suggest that the participants cued for gender of writer may have been influenced by gender stereotypes, leading to errors in some of their judgments.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据