4.6 Article

RGD peptides immobilized on a mechanically deformable surface promote osteoblast differentiation

期刊

JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 12, 页码 2130-2140

出版社

AMER SOC BONE & MINERAL RES
DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.12.2130

关键词

arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptides; osteoblast; silicone membrane; cytoskeleton; mechanical forces

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [1R01HL60426] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [1R01DK45419] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The major objective of this work was to attach bone cells to a deformable surface for the effective transmission of force. We functionalized a silastic membrane and treated it with 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTS). A minimal RGD peptide was then covalently linked to the aminated surface. MC3T3-E1 osteoblast-like cells were cultured on the arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD)-treated membrane for 3-15 days and cell attachment and proliferation was evaluated. We observed that cells were immediately bound to the membrane and proliferated. After 8 days on the material surface, osteoblasts exhibited high levels of ALP staining, indicating that the cells were undergoing maturation. Alizarin red staining and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis showed that the mineral formed by the cells was a biological apatite. The second objective was to apply a mechanical force to cells cultured on the modified silicone membrane. Dynamic equibiaxial strain, 2% magnitude, and a 0.25-Hz frequency were applied to bone cells for 2 It. Osteoblasts elicited increased phalloidin fluorescence, suggesting that there was reorganization of the cytoskeleton. Furthermore, the applied strain elicited increased expression of the a,133 integrin receptor. We concluded that the covalent binding of RGD peptides to a silicone membrane provides a compatible surface for the attachment and subsequent differentiation of osteoblasts. Moreover, the engineered surface transduces applied mechanical forces directly to the adherent cells via integrin receptors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据