4.6 Article

The transiting system GJ1214: high-precision defocused transit observations and a search for evidence of transit timing variation

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 549, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219996

关键词

planetray systems; stars: individual: GJ1214; methods: statistical; methods: observational; techniques: photometric

资金

  1. STFC
  2. Communaute francaise de Belgique - Actions de recherche concertees - Academie universitaire Wallonie-Europe
  3. KASI [2012-1-410-02]
  4. NPRP grant, Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation) [NPRP-09-476-1-78]
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I001131/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. STFC [ST/J001562/1, ST/K002465/1, ST/J001651/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. We present 11 high-precision photometric transit observations of the transiting super-Earth planet GJ 1214 b. Combining these data with observations from other authors, we investigate the ephemeris for possible signs of transit timing variations (TTVs) using a Bayesian approach. Methods. The observations were obtained using telescope-defocusing techinques, and achieve a high precision with random errors in the photometry as low as 1 mmag per point. To investigate the possiblity of TTVs in the light curve, we calculate the overall probability of a TTV signal using Bayesian methods. Results. The observations are used to determine the photometric parameters and the physical properties of the GJ 1214 system. Our results are in good agreement with published values. Individual times of mid-transit are measured with uncertainites as low as 10 s, allowing us to reduce the uncertainity in the orbital period by a factor or two. Conclusions. A Bayesian analysis reveals that it is highly improbable that the observed transit times is explained by TTV caused by a planet in the nominal habitable zone, when compared with the simpler alternative of a linear ephemeris.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据