4.6 Article

Variable stars in the globular cluster M 28 (NGC 6626)

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 543, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118523

关键词

globular clusters: individual: M 28 (NGC 6626); stars: evolution; stars: variables: RR Lyrae

资金

  1. Ministry for the Economy, Development, and Tourism's Programa Inicativa Cientifica Milenio [P07-021-F]
  2. Proyecto Basal [PFB-06/2007]
  3. Proyecto FONDECYT Regular [1110326]
  4. Proyecto Anillo [ACT-86]
  5. US National Science Foundation [AST 0607249, AST 0707756]
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  7. National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. We present a new search for variable stars in the Galactic globular cluster M 28 (NGC 6626). Aims. The search is based on a series of BVI images obtained with the SMARTS Consortium's 1.3 m telescope at Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, Chile. Methods. The search was carried out using the ISIS v2.2 image subtraction package. Results. We find a total of 25 variable stars in the field of the cluster, nine being new discoveries. Of the newly found variables, one is an ab-type RR Lyrae star, six are c-type RR Lyrae, and two are long-period/semi-regular variables. V22, previously classified as a type II Cepheid, appears as a bona-fide RRc in our data. In turn, V20, previously classified as an ab-type RR Lyrae, could not be properly phased with any reasonable period. Conclusions. The properties of the ab-type RR Lyrae stars in M 28 appear most consistent with an Oosterhoff-intermediate classification, which is unusual for bona-fide Galactic globulars clusters. However, the cluster's c-type variables do not clearly support such an Oosterhoff type, and a hybrid Oosterhoff I/II system is accordingly another possibility, thus raising the intriguing possibility of multiple populations being present in M 28. Coordinates, periods, and light curves in differential fluxes are provided for all the detected variables.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据