4.6 Article

Hydrogen cyanide and isocyanide in prestellar cores

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 534, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117134

关键词

ISM: abundances; ISM: molecules; ISM: clouds; ISM: general; radio lines: ISM; molecular data

资金

  1. European Community

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. We studied the abundance of HCN, (HCN)-C-13, and (HNC)-C-13 in a sample of prestellar cores, in order to search for species associated with high density gas. Methods. We used the IRAM 30 m radiotelescope to observe along the major and the minor axes of L1498, L1521E, and TMC 2, three cores chosen on the basis of their CO depletion properties. We mapped the J = 1 -> 0 transition of HCN, (HCN)-C-13, and (HNC)-C-13 towards the source sample plus the J = 1 -> 0 transition of N2H+ and the J = 2 -> 1 transition of (CO)-O-18 in TMC 2. We used two different radiative transfer codes, making use of recent collisional rate calculations, in order to determine more accurately the excitation temperature, leading to a more exact evaluation of the column densities and abundances. Results. We find that the optical depths of both (HCN)-C-13(1-0) and (HNC)-C-13(1-0) are non-negligible, allowing us to estimate excitation temperatures for these transitions in many positions in the three sources. The observed excitation temperatures are consistent with recent computations of the collisional rates for these species and they correlate with hydrogen column density inferred from dust emission. We conclude that HCN and HNC are relatively abundant in the high density zone, n(H-2) similar to 10(5) cm(-3), where CO is depleted. The relative abundance [HNC]/[HCN] differs from unity by at most 30% consistent with chemical expectations. The three hyperfine satellites of HCN(1-0) are optically thick in the regions mapped, but the profiles become increasingly skewed to the blue (L1498 and TMC 2) or red (L1521E) with increasing optical depth suggesting absorption by foreground layers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据