4.6 Article

The Westerbork Hydrogen Accretion in LOcal GAlaxieS (HALOGAS) survey I. Survey description and pilot observations

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 526, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015938

关键词

galaxies: spiral; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: ISM; galaxies: halos; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics

资金

  1. Netherlands Foundation for Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. National Science Foundation [AST 0908106, AST 0908126]
  3. Research Corporation
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [908106] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce a new, very deep neutral hydrogen (Hi) survey being performed with the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT). The Westerbork Hydrogen Accretion in LOcal GAlaxieS (HALOGAS) Survey is producing an archive of some of the most sensitive HI observations available, on the angular scales which are most useful for studying faint, diffuse gas in and around nearby galaxies. The survey data are being used to perform careful modeling of the galaxies, characterizing their gas content, morphology, and kinematics, with the primary goal of revealing the global characteristics of cold gas accretion onto spiral galaxies in the local Universe. In this paper, we describe the survey sample selection, the data acquisition, reduction, and analysis, and present the data products obtained during our pilot program, which consists of UGC 2082, NGC 672, NGC 925, and NGC 4565. The observations reveal a first glimpse of the picture that the full HALOGAS project aims to illuminate: the properties of accreting HI in different types of spirals, and across a range of galactic environments. None of the pilot survey galaxies hosts an HI halo of the scale of NGC 891, but all show varying indications of halo gas features. We compare the properties of detected features in the pilot survey galaxies with their global characteristics, and discuss similarities and differences with NGC 891 and NGC 2403.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据