4.6 Article

Spectroscopic characterization of a sample of metal-poor solar-type stars from the HARPS planet search program Precise spectroscopic parameters and mass estimation

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 526, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015646

关键词

stars: fundamental parameters; planetary systems; stars: abundances; stars: statistics

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (Portugal) [SFRH/BPD/47611/2008]
  2. European Research Council/European Community
  3. FCT [PTDC/CTE-AST/098528/2008, PTDC/CTE-AST/66181/2006, PTDC/CTE-AST/098604/2008]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/47611/2008] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stellar metallicity strongly correlates with the presence of planets and their properties. To check for new correlations between stars and the existence of an orbiting planet, we determine precise stellar parameters for a sample of metal-poor solar-type stars. This sample was observed with the HARPS spectrograph and is part of a program to search for new extrasolar planets. The stellar parameters were determined using an LTE analysis based on equivalent widths (EW) of iron lines and by imposing excitation and ionization equilibrium. The ARES code was used to allow automatic and systematic derivation of the stellar parameters. Precise stellar parameters and metallicities were obtained for 97 low metal-content stars. We also present the derived masses, luminosities, and new parallaxes estimations based on the derived parameters, and compare our spectroscopic parameters with an infra-red flux method calibration to check the consistency of our method in metal poor stars. Both methods seems to give the same effective temperature scale. Finally we present a new calibration for the temperature as a function of B - V and [Fe/H]. This was obtained by adding these new metal poor stars in order to increase the range in metallicity for the calibration. The standard deviation of this new calibration is similar to 50 K.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据