4.5 Review

Temporal and spatial patterns of ovarian gene transcription following an ovulatory dose of gonadotropin in the rat

期刊

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
卷 67, 期 6, 页码 1662-1670

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.005173

关键词

follicle; granulosa cells; ovary; ovulation; progesterone

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD16229, HD07495] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, there have been a number of efforts to identify genes that are expressed in mature ovarian follicles in response to an ovulatory dose of LH or its homologue hCG. This review keys on 20 ovulation-specific genes that we have identified by the molecular procedure known as differential display. The objective is to use this sampling of genes to illustrate the diversity in the temporal and spatial patterns of expression of genes in the ovary following the stimulus of this gonadal target tissue by a single glycoprotein hormone. The specific genes that are surveyed include 5-aminolevulinate synthase; early growth response protein-1; gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase; cyclooxygenase-2; epiregulin; pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide; tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene-6; regulator of G-protein signaling protein-2; adrenodoxin; steroidogenic acute regulatory protein; 3alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase; CD63, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs; tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1; carbonyl reductase, a G-protein-coupled receptor; pancreatitis-associated protein-III; glutathione S-transferase; and metallothionein-1. The ovulatory expression of these different genes is predominantly within the granulosa layer of mature follicles. However, there were also instances of expression in the thecal and stromal tissue of the ovary, as well as in vascular endothelial cells and in luteal tissue. The overwhelming impression is that the molecular events of ovulation are far more complex, and therefore more highly ordered, than originally imagined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据