4.7 Article

Irinotecan combined with bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid Nordic schedule as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 1868-1873

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdf324

关键词

chemotherapy; colorectal cancer; irinotecan; Nordic schedule

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: This multicentre phase 11 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of irinotecan combined with the Nordic schedule of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) as first-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal. cancer. Patients and methods: Seventy-four patients with measurable disease and a WHO performance status of 2 or less were treated with irinotecan 210 mg/m(2) as a 30-90 min intravenous infusion on day 1, followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m2 and FA 60 mg/m(2) bolus on days I and 2, every 2 weeks, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the objective response rate. Results: Twenty-nine out of 68 evaluable patients achieved a complete (n = 7) or partial (n = 22) response, leading to an overall response rate of 43% [95% confidence interval (CI) 31% to 55%]. The median duration of response was 10 months. The estimated median time to progression and survival were 6.4 months (95% Cl 5.4-9.0) and 15.6 months (95% CI 13.3-19.0), respectively, in the intention-to-treat population. A total of 860-cycles were administered to 74 patients. Neutropenia was the main adverse event with grade 3-4 toxicity in 66% of patients and 17.5% of cycles. Grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities were infrequent and included diarrhoea in 16% of patients and 2% of cycles and nausea/vomiting in 10% of patients and 1% of cycles. Conclusions: Irinotecan combined with the bolus Nordic schedule of 5-FU`/FA is active in advanced colorectal cancer with an easily managed safety profile which ensures good schedule compliance. The low incidence of grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicity justifies the further evaluation of this combination in the context of randomised clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据